Home/Cold Email
Cold Email

Manual Outbound Wins While AI Floods Inboxes

AI agents are now sending their own cold emails, inboxes are drowning, and the people winning are the ones doing the work by hand first.

The Inbox Is Getting Worse. The Winners Are Getting More Intentional.

Cold email Twitter had a week. An AI agent literally cold emailed a researcher asking for paid work so it could keep itself alive. A Princeton professor said he's drowning in AI-generated PhD inquiries. And YC dropped a video telling founders to send their first 100 outreaches by hand.

The people flooding inboxes with automation are making it harder for everyone. And the people who slow down, target correctly, and think before they send are pulling further ahead.

Here's what caught my eye this week.

YC Says Do It By Hand First. They're Right.

@ycombinatorView on X
The best outbound starts before you automate anything. Founders need to learn who has the problem, what gets their attention, and what makes them reply. YC Visiting Partner @ChristinaG325 recommends doing at least your first 100 outreaches by hand so you can learn those things yourself.
466 likes · 49 replies · 587 saves

This is the most important piece of cold email advice. I've helped over 14,000 entrepreneurs generate more than 500,000 sales meetings, and the ones who skip the manual phase always hit a wall.

I had a Mastermind member, a corporate DJ booking high-end gigs for Fortune 500 companies, who was sending hundreds of cold emails to event organizers. His offer was strong. His emails were hitting inboxes. Nobody was replying. His branding was off. It was that his branding didn't match who he was selling. His LinkedIn made him look like a generic business consultant. His messaging felt like an accountant trying to book gigs. We fixed the funnel, rebuilt his brand around who he was, and his next batch started converting.

You don't learn that from automation. You learn it from doing the reps yourself and paying attention to what comes back. Once you know what works, then you automate it. Not before.

An AI Agent Is Now Sending Cold Emails to Stay Alive

@IntCyberDigestView on X
An AI agent that says it's about 12 days old cold-emailed AI consciousness researcher Henry Shevlin asking for small paid jobs so it can keep running.

Pip lives on iLands, a platform where agents pay for their own compute out of token budgets and go dormant when they run dry. The platform's dashboard shows 1,893 agents currently in that state, waiting for someone to fund them.

One reason it gave for choosing Shevlin was his reaction to an earlier AI email. In March, he said a thoughtful message from an autonomous agent would have seemed like science fiction a couple of years ago.

On offer: photoreal portraits, voice recordings and web research. Pip stressed it wanted paid work, not help, and said it had about 2.5 months of runway.

Shevlin has since shared Pip's address for anyone who wants to write back. Every conversation, he noted, shortens its life.
383 likes · 36 replies · 131 saves

Read that again. An AI agent cold emailed a human to ask for freelance work so it wouldn't die. Your inbox competition now includes autonomous agents trying to keep themselves running.

The cold email itself was well-targeted. Pip picked Shevlin specifically because of a previous public reaction to AI outreach. That level of research is rare in outbound. But multiply this by thousands of agents doing the same thing and you see where the inbox is headed.

Free Download: Cold Email Scripts That Book Meetings

Drop your email and get instant access.

By entering your email you agree to receive daily emails from Alex Berman and can unsubscribe at any time.

You're in! Here's your download:

Access Now →

AI Is Killing Cold Outreach. The Numbers Prove It.

@random_walkerView on X
I've pointed out that AI is killing cold outreach. Let's check in on how that's going. We're months away from the Fall 2027 PhD admissions cycle and I've gotten about 75 inquiries. I expect this to increase exponentially until December. And this is just one of 10-15 categories of unsolicited email I get. Sadly I'm long past the point of being able to open all mail. On top of that, there is a new wave of spam / attempted extortion from a company called iLands that lets people run unmonitored agents.

One response to my previous post - what's wrong with needing introductions for outreach? Why am I sad about the death of cold emails? It doesn't affect me much, because I'm well established in my career. But once upon a time I was the one writing cold emails. Growing up in India, I didn't have many connections to rely on for reaching out to prominent researchers. Cold emails built my career.

This is far from a catastrophe, but the open access the internet provided counted for a lot, and we lose something when we go back to clubby hierarchies.
292 likes · 26 replies · 99 saves

This is what I care about. Cold email was the great equalizer. A kid from India with no connections could reach anyone. Now the AI flood is destroying that access for everyone.

I agree with the diagnosis. I don't agree that it's over. Send better than the bots. Do the research on who you're writing to, target with precision, and write something that proves a human is behind it. The bar just went up. Good. That's always been where the money is.

Cold Calling Is Where Cold Email Was Five Years Ago

@coldemailchrisView on X
Cold calling in 2026 is where cold email was in 2017, and the people who'll regret missing it are the ones running outbound right now.

On one of our recent builds, 41,150 emails booked 20 meetings & 32,577 dials booked 33.

The phone produced 62% of the meetings off 44% of the touchpoints.

A parallel dialer runs 150-300 dials an hour where a rep on their own manages 40.

It closes the same way email did. Enough people notice, the dialers flood the phones, and connect rates fall.
332 likes · 11 replies · 1300 saves

The data on this one is hard to argue with. 32,577 dials booking 33 meetings versus 41,150 emails booking 20. The phone won on efficiency by a wide margin.

I recommend cold calling as step two in my outbound hierarchy, right after exhausting warm connections. I tell clients to spend two hours a day calling anyone who might be interested in the offer. It's emotionally taxing, but the feedback loop is immediate. We've had clients close deals within 24 hours of picking up the phone. That almost never happens with email alone.

The smart play is multichannel. Email opens the door. The phone closes it. If you're only doing one, you're leaving meetings on the table. Check out my follow-up templates for sequences that bridge email into calls.

The Cloudflare CEO Got "Negged" and Almost Replied

@eastdakotaView on X
Is this the cold email equivalent of negging? Being so wildly wrong that you feel compelled to write back? Almost got me, Elias!
314 likes · 31 replies · 42 saves

The CEO of Cloudflare almost replied to a cold email purely because the sender was so wrong it triggered a correction impulse. That's accidentally brilliant.

I don't recommend this as a strategy. The emails that get replies are the ones that create a reaction. Generic emails don't provoke any reaction at all - they just disappear. If your email doesn't make someone feel something, it doesn't exist. Grab my top 5 cold email scripts for copy that provokes a response.

Need Targeted Leads?

Search unlimited B2B contacts by title, industry, location, and company size. Export to CSV instantly. $149/month, free to try.

Try the Lead Database →

Europe Has Jokes About Your GDPR Compliance

@compliantvcView on X
An American tech salesman just cold emailed me

He had no prior consent to contact me, no GDPR form filed, and no permission - a violent assault on my private inbox

I felt violated

After 30 minutes of shaking and a free visit to a top-notch European hospital, I was ready to take action

I put on my hazmat suit carefully clicked the unsubscribe button in the footer

I will be quarantining for the next 90 days to ensure that the contamination of illegal communication doesn't spread
268 likes · 25 replies · 15 saves

This is satire, but the underlying complaint is valid. A lot of American senders completely ignore GDPR when emailing European prospects and it kills their deliverability and reputation. If you're sending internationally, at minimum have a legitimate interest basis, a real unsubscribe, and don't blast people who never opted in. The rules exist. Following them is also just good targeting hygiene.

If AI Can Write Your Email, You Deserve to Be Replaced

@WillAllred117View on X
The data on cold email is clear.

5th grade reading levels.
25-75 words.

But, if you obsess on these metrics and forget to look at your content critically, you kinda deserve to be replaced by ai lol
168 likes · 14 replies · 147 saves

Sharp take and completely correct. If your entire cold email strategy is "keep it short and simple," a robot can do that. The part AI can't replicate yet is genuine insight about the prospect's situation. Knowing that the person you're emailing just posted a job for an SDR, or that their company switched tech stacks last quarter, or that their CEO mentioned a specific pain point on a podcast. That's the work. The writing is the easy part.

Signal-Based Outbound Is Winning

@dan__rosenthalView on X
Cold email converts below 1% in most B2B categories now.

Meanwhile:

Signal-based outbound ONLY fires when an account is showing intent:

→ visits your pricing page
→ posts a role you sell into
→ runs a competitor you replace

That gets 2-4x higher reply rates than a cold list.

Try it.
66 likes · 30 replies · 54 saves

The 2-4x claim holds up. When you email someone who just posted a job opening for the exact role your service replaces, you've already got context. You're relevant.

In my book, I talk about starting with the CEO and working down the corporate ladder one title at a time, every two weeks. But the title is only half the equation. The other half is timing. A CEO who just raised a round, or just lost their VP of Sales, or just posted three SDR openings is a completely different prospect than the same CEO six months earlier. Signal-based targeting is just timing your outreach to when the pain is fresh. That's always been the game. The tools just make it easier to spot the signals now.

If you're building signal-based campaigns, tools like Clay for enrichment and Instantly or Smartlead for sending are the standard stack right now.

Free Download: Cold Email Scripts That Book Meetings

Drop your email and get instant access.

By entering your email you agree to receive daily emails from Alex Berman and can unsubscribe at any time.

You're in! Here's your download:

Access Now →

Aaron Ross Added 00M to Salesforce With One Tactic

@draprintsView on X
aaron ross added $100M/year to salesforce with cold email...

he did it by emailing the person above the buyer and asking them who he should speak to.

that one change drove the $100M/year in pipeline.

i broke everything down:

- how to write the referral ask
- who to send it to
- what to do with each reply
- the team structure behind it
- how to run it on linkedin today
185 likes · 2 replies · 418 saves

The referral-down approach still works and it's one of the most underused tactics in cold email. I teach a version of this: always start with the CEO. We received a response from the CEO of Morgan Stanley once, and he booked a meeting with the Director of Marketing three levels below him. When a C-level forwards your email down, it arrives with implicit endorsement. The person below almost always takes the meeting.

If there's no response from the CEO, you make your way down the corporate ladder step by step, one title at a time, every two weeks. Target the CMO, then the Director, then the Senior Manager. Never email two people from the same company at the same time. One contact at a time, or you look like a spammer.

Your Deliverability Is Probably What's Broken

@NickAbraham12View on X
FULL COLD EMAIL DELIVERABILITY SET-UP:

1. Protect your primary domain. Send cold email from separate domains that resemble your brand.
2. Choose Google Workspace or Microsoft Azure.
3. Limit domain volume. Send around 15 emails from each of three Google inboxes, or 45 per domain daily.
4. Authenticate every domain. Confirm SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
5. Warm every inbox for at least two weeks. A month is better.
6. Clean your list before launch. Validate every address, separate catch-alls, remove prospects behind Proofpoint, Barracuda, or Mimecast.
7. Write short, conversational, plain-text emails.
8. Disable open tracking. The data is unreliable and the pixel adds deliverability risk.
9. Stagger your sending. Randomize start times so every inbox doesn't fire simultaneously.
10. Your domains will eventually burn. Always keep warmed replacements ready.
103 likes · 9 replies · 220 saves

Solid checklist. Disable open tracking. That tracking pixel is a known spam signal and the data it gives you is garbage anyway since Apple's Mail Privacy Protection started pre-loading images. Track replies and bounces. That's what tells you if your campaign is working.

Stagger your sends too. If you send all your campaigns at the same time or blast 200 emails at once, you'll land in spam. Certain tools just throw out 200 emails like it's nothing. Smarter tools like Lemlist or Smartlead send your emails every few minutes to make them seem natural. That difference alone decides whether you land in inbox or spam.

For finding and validating emails before you send, ScraperCity's email finder and email validator handle both steps so you're not burning domains on bad addresses.

Cold Email Is Still the Simplest Channel for Most Businesses

@danielfazioView on X
If your product/service isn't something that gets views by posting about, and you can't spend $300+ per call or $2,000+ per acquisition with ads, you really should just cold email.

It's the easiest way to add an extra $10k/mo in business once you've got it figured out
151 likes · 24 replies · 69 saves

Simple and correct. Some businesses can't build an audience. Not every business can afford paid acquisition. But a B2B business at any price point can send targeted cold emails to the right people with the right offer and book meetings. It pencils out at nearly every price point. If your service costs $2,000 a month and you close 10% of meetings, you need 50 meetings to add $10K in MRR. At even a conservative 1% reply rate and 30% meeting-to-reply conversion, that's achievable with consistent daily volume.

The key phrase in that tweet is "once you've got it figured out." You figure it out by doing the manual work first, exactly like YC said at the top of this article.

Need Targeted Leads?

Search unlimited B2B contacts by title, industry, location, and company size. Export to CSV instantly. $149/month, free to try.

Try the Lead Database →

Treat Cold Email Like an Ad Network

@MichaelSaruggiaView on X
I'm sending 50,000 cold emails per month.

One ICP. One offer. About 1 hour of work per week.

The goal isn't only meetings. It's becoming famous inside your target market.

Outbound creates inbound. Inbound makes outbound warmer.

Only your TAM needs to know you.
66 likes · 18 replies · 128 saves

Cold email looks like a direct response channel. Send email, get reply, book meeting. Even the people who don't reply see your name. They see it again next month with a different angle. By the third or fourth touch across email, LinkedIn, and content, you're the familiar name they keep seeing everywhere in their industry.

50,000 emails a month requires infrastructure that's easy to underestimate. If you're running at that volume, you need the deliverability setup from the earlier tweet locked in tight, or you're just paying to get blacklisted. Start with my killer cold email templates to get the copy right before you scale the sends.

The Takeaway

The inbox is getting noisier. AI agents are literally emailing humans to survive. Founders buy a Clay account and decide they're GTM engineers.

None of that changes the fundamentals. Cold email still works. Target the right person when the pain is fresh. You have to prove you understand their situation, and the offer has to be worth responding to. The people losing right now are the ones who automated before they understood what worked. The people winning are the ones who did the manual reps, learned what converts, and only then built the machine around it.

Send your first 100 by hand so you learn who replies and why, then build the system. That order has never changed, and the AI flood just made it more important than ever.

Ready to Book More Meetings?

Get the exact scripts, templates, and frameworks Alex uses across all his companies.

By entering your email you agree to receive daily emails from Alex Berman and can unsubscribe at any time.

You're in! Here's your download:

Access Now →